I’ve been back and fourth on what to get and I was hoping someone with experience on these type of cameras could help. I’ve had about 3-4 years hands on with the Nikon d40 an I wanted to move on to videos now but I want pictures still also so I just wanted to know the basics and what some of you thought on it I’ve been looking at the d3100 vs d5100 any opinion or help would be great. Thanks.
I was a film camera slr enthusiast- did some semi pro stuff in the past. I was using a 35mm film Nikon FM with nikkor prime and zoom glass. Excellent system for my needs-low light, fast lenses. Unfortunately all stolen some years ago (many $$ worth). We now use digital point and shoots for the family and are fine, but for me, very frustrating – especially lag and other obvious things. I have been researching a dslr, have read about nikon d90’s, 3100 and Canon D550’s, Pentax K-r and K-x. Even looked at second hand Nikon D40 and D200’s (also have looked at some favorable reviews about older Canon’s).
My needs are a camera with no nonsense manual settings with high quality images; that offers automatic modes for my kids (who I want to teach photography) and for my wife to learn to use (she takes great photos with the point and shoot). Not interested in hybrid cameras.
I want to get a f1.4-1.8 55mm prime lens for the camera.
What used cameras would be a good buy (0-0) to build upon? Or should I go for the budget entry level dslrs currently available. I want to build up the system over time. I am unable to spend 00+ at sale point on new technology at the moment. cheers
Im looking for a good entry level DSLR i narrowed it to the sony a2000 or the Nikon d40 but any suggestions or retail sites would be awesome!
edit looking for a multi lens kit set also.
why choose the d40 over the sony or vice versa
i need some reasons that are behind opinions
whats the better deal
A) http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Digital-SteadyShot-Stabilization-75-300mm/dp/B00126P8NU/ref=dp_cp_ob_p_title_1
or
B)http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9999113600050024&type=product&id=pcmprd113700050024
ok thank you for all the help guys, however i cant decide, the d40 looks nice but with out the built in AF im skeptical but from what i hear about the sony is ill outgrow it. I’ve done some minor photography before with some nikons but havnt given a sony a shot before. all help is appreciated. and again please tell me why not just the opinion but ur backing to it.
Thanks,
Ethan
Hi, I have a 6 megapixel nikon D40. The question that I have is simple, I have a sigma 18-50mm f/2.8. It’s not supersharp at 2.8, so if I would upgrade to a 12 megapixel camera, (3000×2000 to 4000 x 3000) then my images would be in higher resolution, making the image more detailed, so "more" sharpness?
If you have a higher resolution, can this effect other stuff, like color accuracy, So in theory if you would make a D40 with 12 megapixel with the same other specs and cpu, and compare this to the 6 megapixel version.
Also I’m still not figured out if my lens has front-focus issues, it think I have some. Is it normal for lenses to have some? Could it have something to do with just DOF, object who are close have more front focus…
If you are a owner of the D700 or D300, have you had good experiences with the fine tuning autofocus mode (a mode where you can adjust front or backfocus, so you have sharper images)
Of course, gear is not all, a newbie with a D3 and fast nikkor lens could do worse then an experienced guy with an entry level dslr?
Ok so I narrowed down my camera list to three. They are the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28, Canon PowerShot SX10, Nikon D40. If you did not see my post before I am going to be using this for a high school photography class. The class will require a point and shoot. The class is also an entry level class in which they teach photoshoping. I want to go one step further and learn more about photography. That’s why I want to either get a DSLR or a close one. I just don’t want to spend a lot of money with the Nikon D40 and never use it. Thanks for your help in advance!
I’m moving on up! I love photography but am not a pro. After seeking Y!A advice in a previous question, I’m just about settled on getting my first DSLR within the next month. I’m told the Nikon D40 is a great choice for an entry level SLR.
I’ve been to a store and handled one and liked it for the most part. I was frustrated though because while the LCD screen is amazing, we couldn’t figure out how to take pictures FROM the LCD screen without having to use the viewfinder. I hate using viewfinders! Is it possible to take pictures from the LCD screen? Would that be in Wallpaper mode or something? The person at the store couldn’t figure it out either.
This next question may be silly, but again, I’m new to SLRs… these cameras won’t have a video setting, will they? I had a Kodak Easyshare prior to this, so I was spoiled (when it worked). I was hoping not to have to buy a separate video camera.
Lastly, is it true I will have to buy a new type of camera memory card? If so, what type, and why? Will I need more than one? With the other cameras I had two 2GB cards and that was plenty. I understand I may have the capability to shoot in RAW format… is that optional, or a set in stone kind of feature? Can I switch back and forth?
Oh- and is the strap that comes with the camera a nice neck strap (like the ones Nikon shows in their tutorials)?
Any other advice or suggestions you may have about this camera as my first SLR would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
So I have a "point&shoot" Powershot camera, and I’ve started to get extremely frustrated with the lack of settings/options/general control over how the picture is going to turn out. I’ve been looking at all sorts of entry level DSLRs, but I’m worried I might grow out of something that’s entry level, and just need a new camera in a few years. Should I look at some of the "prosumer" cameras? Or just go with a good entry level, like the Canon XSi or Nikon D40 or D60? Most consumers buying entry level DSLRs don’t really know how to do anything but point and shoot, but as I know a fair amount about cameras, I’m not sure if entry level is what I need. Also, I’m trying not to spend too much money, I’m mainly looking for something sub-00. Thanks!
I don’t need anything too fancy, just an entry-level starter digital slr camera kit.
preferably something under 0
I was looking at the Canon Rebel XT, but you can’t use the LCD screen as a viewfinder and it doesn’t make videos which is kind of a turn-off for the money I would pay for it.
I was also considering the nikon d40 or d40x
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated
I’m not really that concerned about the video part, more so about the view finder
I currently have a point and shoot HP 7.0 MP digital camera. I am just starting to look at DSLRs because I want to upgrade. I am looking for clearer pictures that have a more professional look. I have heard the Nikon D40 is a good entry level DSLR, but it is only 6.1 MP. Someone told me MP had to do with picture clarity; would this mean the Nikon D40 pictures would be less clear than my point and shoot pictures? It doesn’t make sense to me. So basically, what do MP have to do with as far as how the photo looks?
I don’t like the D3000 because it doesn’t have live view. The D40 is still on Nikon’s website so I assumed it was still being sold..